Random thoughts from somebody working on the next Windows OS
I've installed it but I can't notice any evident boost ;-)Matbe the old sarch engine was't too bad. However a new search engine is better :-D
... and myITforum are reporting that it kills Outlook performance.http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/rtrent/archive/2008/06/04/new-windows-search-4-0-kills-ms-outlook-performance.aspx
philip - WS 4.0 needs to recreate the index...but it should not be creating a problem. I'll point the WS people to that post.
http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/shipping-seven-is-a-fraud/You are a retard.
Just installed on my Vista machine (a nothing-special AMD duel core with 2 GB of RAM); search performance has improved quite clearly for me. Thanks.If you guys could pull off a similar performance boost for the whole OS in Windows 7, you might see a Windows 95-esq customer enthusiasm.
The search in Win2k worked just fine - the engine XP was a step backwards.The Search engine Vista redefined huge step backwards.And you want me to install the next version? Mmmmmmm, lemme think about that one.No freaking way.
Xepol - Why would you say that?In what way do you find Vista's search capabilities to be lacking?
Property installed and configured you can limit it to search just the start menu and simulate the search in Vista for XP. Very handy.
this one works fine..not much difference though...gadget help
This comment has been removed by the author.
I've installed it but I can't notice any evident boost ;-)
ReplyDeleteMatbe the old sarch engine was't too bad. However a new search engine is better :-D
... and myITforum are reporting that it kills Outlook performance.
ReplyDeletehttp://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/rtrent/archive/2008/06/04/new-windows-search-4-0-kills-ms-outlook-performance.aspx
philip - WS 4.0 needs to recreate the index...but it should not be creating a problem. I'll point the WS people to that post.
ReplyDeletehttp://neosmart.net/blog/2008/shipping-seven-is-a-fraud/
ReplyDeleteYou are a retard.
Just installed on my Vista machine (a nothing-special AMD duel core with 2 GB of RAM); search performance has improved quite clearly for me. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteIf you guys could pull off a similar performance boost for the whole OS in Windows 7, you might see a Windows 95-esq customer enthusiasm.
The search in Win2k worked just fine - the engine XP was a step backwards.
ReplyDeleteThe Search engine Vista redefined huge step backwards.
And you want me to install the next version? Mmmmmmm, lemme think about that one.
No freaking way.
Xepol - Why would you say that?
ReplyDeleteIn what way do you find Vista's search capabilities to be lacking?
Property installed and configured you can limit it to search just the start menu and simulate the search in Vista for XP. Very handy.
ReplyDeletethis one works fine..not much difference though...
ReplyDeletegadget help
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete